Parsing the "transportation product liability" text, example 1
This and several following posts parse and critique the "transportation product liability" text posted here.
1. As an attorney focused on transportation product liability cases for the last 20 years, there have been several recurring defense theories and themes by the manufacturer that have been consistent and predictable.
a. This sentence contains a dangling modifier. The dependent, introductory clause modifies the first noun that follows it ("there"). Of course, this makes no sense because the modifying clause is supposed to modify the attorney. So it is said to dangle. What makes this dangler especially glaring is that it actually contains the noun, "attorney," that it is intended to modify.
For example, many danglers look like this:
Thus, example 1 is all the more glaring because it seems that any writer could see that the introductory modifying clause must be followed by a reference to the "attorney," perhaps "I."
Suggestion:
Suggestion:
Suggestion:
Suggestion:
Full and final suggestion:
Enough for now.
_____________
Wayne Schiess
Director of Legal Writing | The University of Texas School of Law | Website | Seminars | Articles | Books: Preparing Legal Documents Nonlawyers Can Read and Understand
| Better Legal Writing
| Writing for the Legal Audience
| The Legal Memo: A Basic Guide
1. As an attorney focused on transportation product liability cases for the last 20 years, there have been several recurring defense theories and themes by the manufacturer that have been consistent and predictable.
a. This sentence contains a dangling modifier. The dependent, introductory clause modifies the first noun that follows it ("there"). Of course, this makes no sense because the modifying clause is supposed to modify the attorney. So it is said to dangle. What makes this dangler especially glaring is that it actually contains the noun, "attorney," that it is intended to modify.
For example, many danglers look like this:
- Focusing on transportation product liability cases for the last 20 years, there have been . . .
Thus, example 1 is all the more glaring because it seems that any writer could see that the introductory modifying clause must be followed by a reference to the "attorney," perhaps "I."
Suggestion:
- As an attorney focused on transportation product liability cases for the last 20 years, I have seen several . . .
- theories and themes by the manufacturer
Suggestion:
- theories and themes raised by the manufacturer
Suggestion:
- theories and themes raised by manufacturers
- I have seen several themes and theories [that have been] raised by manufacturers
Suggestion:
- I have seen manufacturers raise several recurring defense theories and themes consistently and predictably.
Full and final suggestion:
- As an attorney focused on transportation product liability cases for the last 20 years, I have seen manufacturers raise several defense theories and themes consistently and predictably.
Enough for now.
_____________
Wayne Schiess
Director of Legal Writing | The University of Texas School of Law | Website | Seminars | Articles | Books: Preparing Legal Documents Nonlawyers Can Read and Understand


Comments